Authors:
Avinash Singh, Amit Patil
Download free PDF
Pet Boarding Services Market Size & Share 2026-2035
Report ID: GMI11339
|
Published Date: August 2026
|
Report Format: PDF/Excel/Dashboard/Platform
Download Free PDF
Explore Our Licensing Options:
Download Free PDF
Pet Boarding Services Market
Get a free sample of this report
Get a free sample of this report Pet Boarding Services Market
Is your requirement urgent? Please give us your business email
for a speedy delivery!

Pet Boarding Services Market Size
The pet boarding services market was valued at USD 12 billion in 2025 and is projected to increase from USD 12.9 billion in 2026 to USD 23 billion by 2035, representing a 6.6% CAGR over 2025–2035. Growth moderates from the 7.9% historic CAGR recorded during 2022–2025 as mature facility markets absorb more demand, while daycare, in-home formats, and digital booking expand the market's use cases.
Pet Boarding Services Market Key Takeaways
Market Leader: PetSmart PetsHotel led with over 4% market share in 2025.
Leading Players: Top 5 players in this market include PetSmart PetsHotel, Dogtopia Enterprises, Camp Bow Wow (Propelled Brands), VCA Animal Hospitals (Mars Petcare), IVC Evidensia, which collectively held a market share of 15% in 2025.
The market covers paid temporary care and accommodation for companion animals, including overnight boarding, daycare, in-home pet sitting, in-home boarding, and veterinary or medically supervised boarding. It excludes standalone grooming, training, dog walking without a stay, veterinary treatment, pet retail, and non-commercial shelters.
Demand begins with the size and spending habits of pet-owning households. APPA reported that 95 million U.S. households owned a pet in 2025, including 71 million dog-owning households [1]American Pet Products Association, National Pet Owners Survey 2025, americanpetproducts.org. For providers, the commercial consequence is not simply a larger customer pool: dogs require repeat daytime supervision and travel-related stays more often than species that can remain at home for short periods. That relationship helps explain why daycare and digitally coordinated in-home care are growing faster than the established overnight-facility base.
The operating model is also changing. Facility operators compete on controlled environments, staff routines, capacity utilization, and trust built through direct client relationships. Marketplace and referral-led models reduce discovery and scheduling friction, but shift the competitive burden toward provider verification, reviews, responsiveness, and service consistency. The market therefore does not move uniformly toward one format; it divides between facilities that can monetize standardized care and networks that can efficiently match owners with home-based supply.
GMI Analyst View
The forecast reflects a reallocation of spending rather than a simple expansion of conventional kennels. Overnight boarding remains essential for multi-night travel and owners who value dedicated premises, but its share declines as recurring daycare and in-home alternatives serve different absence patterns. Operators with a single overnight product face a utilization challenge: demand is episodic and concentrated around travel periods, whereas daycare can convert working-week routines into recurring revenue.
Trust is the common commercial constraint across formats. A facility can create confidence through visible protocols, controlled access, and familiar staff; an in-home network must create it through screening, reputation signals, and reliable communication. As online booking reaches a larger share of transactions, the advantage will accrue to providers that make care quality legible before purchase rather than merely offering digital checkout.
Key Drivers
Rising pet ownership provides the addressable base, but utilization depends on whether owners need care outside the home. Daycare benefits most directly from workday absences because its value proposition is recurring supervision, exercise, and socialization rather than occasional travel coverage. That makes daycare less exposed than overnight boarding to the timing of holiday and leisure travel.
Premiumization creates a second growth path. Luxury pet hotels, dedicated cat facilities, enriched play programs, and veterinary-adjacent options allow providers to differentiate a service that is otherwise difficult to compare before purchase. Higher-value offerings require more investment in space, staffing, monitoring, and protocols, but they can also reduce substitutability with informal care from family or friends.
Digital discovery broadens demand for both facilities and independent sitters. Online booking is projected to rise from 35.0% of market revenue in 2022 to 65.0% by 2035, a 12.1% CAGR. The shift matters because it gives small providers access to demand beyond their immediate neighborhood while forcing established operators to compete on response time, availability visibility, and review-led reputation. Public marketplace disclosures provide an external reference point for the development of technology-enabled, in-home pet-care models [2]Rover Group Inc., Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year 2022, sec.gov.
Key Restraints
Labor intensity limits operating leverage. Boarding providers must maintain animal supervision, cleaning, feeding, handover, and incident-response routines even when occupancy fluctuates. Fixed facility costs can be particularly difficult to absorb outside peak travel periods, while home-based providers must establish trust without the physical cues of a commercial site.
Care requirements also differ materially by species, temperament, and medical needs. A standardized dog-daycare model cannot be transferred directly to cats, birds, or exotic pets, where handling, housing, disease-control practices, and owner expectations may be different. This constrains network standardization and raises the cost of expanding into specialist categories.
Compliance expectations can increase the cost of entering or scaling facility-based formats. Licensing, land-use conditions, animal-welfare rules, and local operating requirements vary by jurisdiction. The practical result is a fragmented supply base in which chains and franchisees must balance brand-wide protocols against locally specific requirements.
GMI Analyst View
The principal tension is between convenience-led demand and the cost of proving safe, reliable care. Digital booking lowers the customer-acquisition barrier, but it does not remove the operational work required to deliver a credible stay. Providers that treat online distribution as a substitute for staff quality or care controls may generate demand without building repeat business.
Fragmentation also creates two distinct expansion routes. Facility chains can use standard operating procedures, brand familiarity, and recurring daycare programs to densify local markets. Home-based and marketplace models can add supply with less real-estate investment, but their ability to scale depends on consistent screening and service quality. Neither model is inherently superior; their economics are shaped by local labor availability, urban density, customer trust, and the mix of short-stay versus recurring demand.
Pet Boarding Services Market Segment Analysis
Service Type
Overnight/traditional boarding accounted for 45.0% of market revenue in 2022 and is projected to represent 34.0% in 2035, growing at a 4.8% CAGR. Its scale reflects the enduring need for multi-night care, but slower growth indicates that travel-related stays are being supplemented by formats tied to everyday routines or home-based preferences. U.S. government classifications of pet-services activity provide a directional benchmark for the division between boarding and adjacent service categories [3]U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, NAICS 81291, bls.gov.
Daycare services are projected to expand at a 10.2% CAGR, increasing from 20.0% of market revenue in 2022 to 29.0% by 2035. The format is commercially attractive because recurring weekday use can stabilize demand and supports add-on services, although it requires operators to manage group safety, staffing levels, and facility throughput. Franchise disclosure materials for Camp Bow Wow and Dogtopia demonstrate the relevance of scalable, standardized daycare-and-boarding systems in North America [4]Camp Bow Wow, Franchise Disclosure Document 2024 - FTC FDD Database.
In-home pet sitting and in-home boarding are forecast to grow at 8.2% and 8.5% CAGRs, respectively. Their appeal lies in keeping an animal in a familiar home or household setting, which can be particularly relevant for owners seeking alternatives to group facilities. Veterinary/medical boarding remains a specialized category, expanding at a 3.3% CAGR as its clinical requirements narrow the customer base and increase operating complexity. U.S. pet-insurance data and broader pet-services spending data provide context for the distinction between insured veterinary expenditures and boarding-related demand.
Pet Type
Dogs represented 72.0% of market revenue in 2022 and are projected to account for 67.0% in 2035. Their continuing dominance reflects the breadth of dog-specific offerings across daycare, overnight stays, home boarding, and sitting. The modest share decline is structural rather than absolute: other species categories are growing from smaller bases. APPA's household ownership data show the scale of the dog-owning base supporting this service mix.
Cats are projected to grow at an 8.8% CAGR, while exotic pets and others are forecast to expand at 10.3%, the highest rate among pet types. These categories create a specialist opportunity rather than a broad-volume substitute for dog care. Providers need species-appropriate housing, handling knowledge, and care routines, making specialist facilities and trained independent sitters more defensible than generalized offerings.
Small animals and mammals, along with birds, are each projected to maintain a 4.0%–7.0% share range through 2035. Their stable contribution supports selective service design, but does not justify assuming that every dog-focused facility can profitably serve these categories.
Facility Type
Commercial kennels and catteries remain central where owners seek formal premises and established overnight routines. Luxury pet hotels and resorts compete through differentiated accommodation and service depth, while veterinary clinic-based boarding addresses situations in which clinical oversight is a primary purchasing criterion.
Home-based and independent sitters expand the available care supply without equivalent fixed real-estate investment. Digital marketplace aggregators make that supply easier to find and book, but depend on quality assurance mechanisms to prevent the customer experience from becoming inconsistent. Facility choices therefore represent different trust architectures as much as different property formats.
Booking Method
Online booking is subdivided into third-party marketplaces, direct websites, and social-media or referral-led transactions. Third-party platforms can support discovery and comparison; direct websites give facility operators greater control over customer relationships; referral-led booking can be effective for independent providers with strong local reputations.
Offline booking includes walk-in and phone reservations, along with recurring or subscription arrangements. Offline revenue grows more slowly, at a 2.1% CAGR, and its share falls from 65.0% in 2022 to 35.0% in 2035. The decline does not imply channel disappearance. Recurring clients, assessment-led admissions, and higher-care stays can still benefit from direct interaction, particularly where an operator needs to evaluate animal suitability before confirming a booking.
GMI Analyst View
Segment growth is being determined by the frequency and setting of owner absence. Overnight boarding remains anchored to travel, whereas daycare monetizes workday separation and in-home formats serve owners who prioritize continuity of environment. Those demand occasions are not interchangeable, which is why a portfolio of formats can be more resilient than a single-service offering.
The fastest-growing revenue pools also require more deliberate operating choices. Daycare depends on safe group management and predictable capacity use; in-home services depend on matching and trust; specialty care depends on species capability. Growth rates alone should not be interpreted as ease of entry. In several cases, the faster segment carries a higher requirement for provider qualification, process discipline, or reputation-building.
Pet Boarding Services Market Regional Analysis
North America
North America represented approximately 51.0% of the global market in 2025 and is projected to grow at a 5.8% CAGR through 2035. The U.S. market was valued at USD 5.28 billion in 2025. Its scale reflects a large pet-owning household base, extensive facility infrastructure, and established franchise and multi-site operating models. Canada contributes a smaller but compatible market, supported by substantial dog and cat ownership and a similar need for professionally organized care [5]Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Pet Ownership in Canada Report 2024, agriculture.canada.ca.
Europe
Europe accounted for approximately 20.9% of global revenue in 2025 and is forecast to expand at a 5.2% CAGR. Germany, the UK, France, Italy, and Spain form the principal country scope. Mature pet populations support demand, but growth is more dependent on service differentiation, local compliance, and the shift toward organized providers than on rapid category creation. European pet-population sources covering the region and its major national markets provide the ownership base for this assessment. Veterinary-integrated networks have particular relevance where owners seek care continuity alongside boarding. CVS Group's annual reports provide a public operating reference for the UK veterinary-services environment.
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific accounted for approximately 18.2% of the market in 2025 and is projected to record the highest regional CAGR, at 11.3%. China, Japan, India, Australia, and South Korea represent distinct demand environments. Australia and Japan have comparatively developed pet-care ecosystems, while China, India, and South Korea offer greater headroom for organized boarding, specialist care, and digitally enabled discovery. The region's faster expansion increases the importance of adapting service design and price points to local household economics and urban living patterns. World Bank and IMF macroeconomic data inform the relative growth and household-income context used in regional scaling [6]World Bank, GDP Data 2022–2026, data.worldbank.org.
Latin America
Latin America accounted for approximately 4.7% of global revenue in 2025. Brazil, Mexico, and Argentina are the principal markets, with growth tied to urban pet ownership and the gradual formalization of care supply. Provider models that can operate with lower fixed costs may have an advantage where household spending power and commercial-facility density are more uneven.
Middle East and Africa
The Middle East and Africa represented approximately 2.0% of global revenue in 2025. South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE are the defined country markets. Growth begins from a smaller base and is likely to be concentrated in major urban areas, where premium boarding, expatriate demand, and formalized pet-care services can support higher-value offerings.
GMI Analyst View
Regional growth is less a function of pet ownership alone than of the ability to convert ownership into paid, trusted care. North America remains the largest revenue pool because it combines household demand with dense facility supply and familiar professional-care models. Its slower growth rate reflects maturity, not weak demand.
Asia Pacific's higher growth outlook changes the allocation of investment attention, but it does not create a single regional operating model. Mature markets such as Australia and Japan may reward service refinement and premium positioning, while India, China, and South Korea require providers to build consumer familiarity, local supply, and appropriate digital acquisition channels. The consequence for multi-market operators is clear: standardized brand principles may travel, while pricing, facility design, and booking pathways must remain locally adaptable.
Pet Boarding Services Market Share & Competitive Landscape
The market is highly fragmented. The top 22 tracked companies collectively accounted for approximately 18.7% of global market revenue in 2025, leaving more than 80% with independent facilities, local sitters, and smaller regional operators. PetSmart PetsHotel held the leading individual share at 3.5%, followed by Dogtopia at 2.5%, Camp Bow Wow at 1.8%, VCA Animal Hospitals at 1.7%, and IVC Evidensia at 1.5%.
Scale is not expressed through a single business model. PetSmart PetsHotel benefits from a national facility footprint and retail adjacency. Dogtopia Enterprises and Camp Bow Wow use franchised or standardized daycare-and-boarding models to expand local coverage. VCA Animal Hospitals and IVC Evidensia compete where veterinary access and medically supervised care are central to the purchasing decision. Destination Pet and Greencross Pet Wellness Company operate multi-service pet-care models that can combine boarding with adjacent customer relationships.
Regional competitors include K9 Resorts Luxury Pet Hotel, Pet Paradise, CVS Group, PetSuites, We Love Pets, Fetch! Pet Care, and Wag Hotels. Their positions range from premium facility care to veterinary-adjacent services and home-based care coordination. Emerging companies in the authorized scope are Paradise 4 Paws, Nekoya Cat Hotel, Petfelix, Lobbo Hotels, Malabo Pet Resort, VIP Pets, and PetsVille.
Competitive advantage is therefore localized. Large brands can improve awareness, process consistency, and purchasing scale, but independent operators can defend demand through neighborhood proximity, specialized species capability, direct relationships, and flexible care formats. Consolidation opportunities exist, yet acquisitions or franchising do not automatically solve the core challenge of maintaining care quality as a network expands.
Recent Industry Developments
In February 2024, Propelled Brands completed its acquisition of Camp Bow Wow, which at the time operated more than 200 locations across 40 U.S. states and Canada. The transaction brought the combined portfolio to more than 1,300 franchise locations and gave Camp Bow Wow access to Propelled Brands' multi-concept franchise development infrastructure and capital resources.
In February 2024, Blackstone completed its approximately USD 2.3 billion all-cash acquisition of Rover Group, taking the company private after stockholder approval. The transaction positioned Rover for product investment and international expansion outside the constraints of public-market ownership.
In January 2025, Dogtopia reported that it had surpassed 285 open facilities in 2024 after opening more than 20 locations during the year. The company also reported 5% same-store sales growth and 12% systemwide revenue growth, and began deploying DASH, its proprietary in-daycare activity-monitoring system, in select markets.
In March 2025, K9 Resorts Luxury Pet Hotel opened its first Los Angeles County location near Los Angeles International Airport. The 10,000-square-foot facility was designed to provide overnight boarding and daycare for more than 100 dogs and represented the first of eleven Southern California locations planned under a multi-unit franchise agreement.
In April 2025, K9 Resorts secured a 13-unit franchise development agreement with Luxury Pet Hotel Investments to expand across Florida, with Fort Lauderdale and Miami identified as priority markets. The agreement extended the group's commitment to develop 48 K9 Resorts locations nationally and followed its USD 10 million March 2024 equity investment in the brand.
In April 2025, Rover Group announced the acquisition of Gudog, a Dublin-based peer-to-peer pet-care marketplace. The transaction followed Rover's earlier acquisition of Cat In A Flat and expanded its European platform portfolio through the acquisition of established regional care networks.
Need a specific section of this report?
Purchase regional analysis, country-level analysis, company profiles, or any other segment-level insights separately
based on your research needs.
Research methodology, data sources & validation process
This report draws on a structured research process built around direct industry conversations, proprietary modelling, and rigorous cross-validation and not just desk research.
Our 6-step research process
1. Research design & analyst oversight
At GMI, our research methodology is built on a foundation of human expertise, rigorous validation, and complete transparency. Every insight, trend analysis, and forecast in our reports is developed by experienced analysts who understand the nuances of your market.
Our approach integrates extensive primary research through direct engagement with industry participants and experts, complemented by comprehensive secondary research from verified global sources. We apply quantified impact analysis to deliver dependable forecasts, while maintaining complete traceability from original data sources to final insights.
2. Primary research
Primary research forms the backbone of our methodology, contributing nearly 80% to overall insights. It involves direct engagement with industry participants to ensure accuracy and depth in analysis. Our structured interview program covers regional and global markets, with inputs from C-suite executives, directors, and subject matter experts. These interactions provide strategic, operational, and technical perspectives, enabling well-rounded insights and reliable market forecasts.
3. Data mining & market analysis
Data mining is a key part of our research process, contributing nearly 20% to the overall methodology. It involves analysing market structure, identifying industry trends, and assessing macroeconomic factors through revenue share analysis of major players. Relevant data is collected from both paid and unpaid sources to build a reliable database. This information is then integrated to support primary research and market sizing, with validation from key stakeholders such as distributors, manufacturers, and associations.
4. Market sizing
Our market sizing is built on a bottom-up approach, starting with company revenue data gathered directly through primary interviews, alongside production volume figures from manufacturers and installation or deployment statistics. These inputs are then pieced together across regional markets to arrive at a global estimate that stays grounded in actual industry activity.
5. Forecast model & key assumptions
Every forecast includes explicit documentation of:
✓ Key growth drivers and their assumed impact
✓ Restraining factors and mitigation scenarios
✓ Regulatory assumptions and policy change risk
✓ Technology adoption curve parameter
✓ Macroeconomic assumptions (GDP growth, inflation, currency)
✓ Competitive dynamics and market entry/exit expectations
6. Validation & quality assurance
The final stages involve human validation, where domain experts manually review filtered data to identify nuances and contextual errors that automated systems might miss. This expert review adds a critical layer of quality assurance, ensuring data aligns with research objectives and domain-specific standards.
Our triple-layer validation process ensures maximum data reliability:
✓ Statistical Validation
✓ Expert Validation
✓ Market Reality Check
Trust & credibility
Verified data sources
Trade publications
Industry journals, trade publications, and specialized media.
Industry databases
Proprietary and third-party market databases
Regulatory filings
Government procurement records and policy documents
Academic research
University studies and specialist institution reports
Company reports
Annual reports, investor presentations, and filings
Expert interviews
C-suite, procurement leads, and technical specialists
GMI archive
13,000+ published studies across 20+ industry verticals
Trade data
Import/export volumes, HS codes, and customs records
Parameters studied & evaluated
Every data point in this report is validated through primary interviews, true bottom-up modelling, and rigorous cross-checks. Read about our research process →